
MSNBC Can't Figure Out Why Trump Would 'Work A Fryer' At McDonald's, As Crowd Cheers Him On
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
8% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
8% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
64% : Trump said as he could be seen thanking her as the crowd in the background could be heard cheering.48% : While Harris has maintained that she worked at the fast-food restaurant in California, Trump responded by saying he's "now worked 15 minutes more than Kamala.
38% : Trump was seen shaking hands with employees, frying the store's french fries and handing out food to supporters through the drive-by window.
14% : Since September, Trump has repeatedly accused Harris of lying about working at a McDonald's in Alameda, California, during the summer of 1983.
8% : In response, Lee defended the vice president, stating that "she tells the truth" while Trump is "constantly telling lies.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.