New: Trump Administration Scores Another Court Win As Judge Weighs in on AEA Removals

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

50% : We got one answer out of Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr. in the Southern District of Texas in early May, in the case styled J.A.V. v. Trump.
46% : After extensive consideration, and for the following reasons, the Court answers that question in the affirmative. RELATED: SCOTUS Hands Trump a Major Win on Use of Alien Enemies Act to Deport Some Illegals The catch there is that Haines also found that the administration hasn't been giving adequate notice to those subject to removal, and thus ordered them to provide the following: In sum, the Court finds that Respondents must provide to individual detainees who are subject to the AEA and the Proclamation the following notice before removing them pursuant to those provisions of law: (1) twenty-one (21) days' notice and an "opportunity to be heard," (2) notice that clearly articulates the fact that the individual detainee is subject to removal under the Proclamation and the AEA, and (3) notice in English and Spanish, the language of those sought to be expelled, and if needed, Spanish-to-English interpreters shall be provided for any necessary hearings.
41% : But on Tuesday, Judge Stephanie Haines of the Western District of Pennsylvania (also a Trump appointee) found that Trump does have authority under AEA to issue the proclamation directing the removal of those who meet the criteria.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.