Washington Post Article RatingD.C. leaders must work together to advance equity for students
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
-4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : Too often, the conversation on how to improve education outcomes for students in our city focuses on the distinction between charter schools and D.C.54% : That's why leaders across the district -- including in charter schools, D.C.
47% : For example, some point to charter schools as the reason that neighborhood middle schools in Wards 7 and 8 are lagging behind the rest of the city in academic outcomes.
45% : Public Schools schools.
41% : Public Schools, Mayor Muriel E. Bowser's (D) administration and the D.C. Council -- must focus on creatively and consistently advancing equity.
28% : Critics often point to data showing that most students living in Ward 3 (which has no charter schools) attend their neighborhood school, and most students living in Wards 7 and 8 (which have charter schools) do not.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
