New York Post Article RatingParents want charters because schools are for kids, not unions -- ...
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
60% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
32% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-21% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
64% : Charter schools now serve mostly black and Hispanic neighborhoods, but Asians also want new charter schools near their communities.63% : Charter schools deliver better results by a wide margin: 88% and 91% of city charter schools outperform district schools in English and math, respectively, and significantly so.
63% : But Asian-American values find support in successful charter schools.
62% : Once they get that, only one conclusion is possible: They must support more charter schools.
60% : For New York's Asian Americans, the need for good charter schools is especially resonant.
57% : New York City's Asian Americans want more charter schools.
55% : A recent survey found that nearly two-thirds of New York City parents view charter schools favorably and want the charter cap lifted.
54% : If anything, charter schools help the city retain students and their funding: They'd otherwise flee the public-school system, the city or the state altogether.
52% : Moving 85 unused allocations from upstate into the city and allowing 21 "zombie" schools' charters to be reallocated would mean dozens of new charter schools.
50% : It's hard to go to a parents' gathering without hearing their complaints about district schools, their anguish over the poor options and stories of how they or their friends left or are planning to leave the system -- whether to charter schools, parochial schools, private schools or outside the city entirely.
50% : Charter schools are public schools; in either scenario, the student and his funding remain in the public-school system.
48% : If anything, outlays should be reduced, since district schools' per-student cost is significantly higher than for students at the charter schools New Yorkers want.
46% : The primary complaint was that under the city funding formula -- under which funding follows students -- more charter schools would divert resources away from district schools.
46% : But the union has displayed greater than usual self-interest the last few years, making families and taxpayers say: Enough, we're out, we're voting with our feet and taxes.
43% : Deal-cutting for the budget makes charter schools a bargaining chip.
39% : Public district schools have become increasingly brazen about dumbing down standards, which is why families seeking better options welcomed Gov. Kathy Hochul's budget proposal that included a plan to enable more charter schools to open in New York City.
33% : There's no reality to charter schools costing $1 billion extra in any foreseeable future, but that doesn't stop the ridiculous narrative against the increasingly popular schools.
33% : District schools are unionized; most charter schools are not, which is why union bosses hate them.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
