South Korea demands apology for Brunson's remarks
- Bias Rating
6% Center
- Reliability
30% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
6% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : Brunson also commands the United Nations Command, which oversees access to the DMZ.54% : The armistice agreement gives the United Nations Command authority over access to the DMZ and civil administration, Kim said.
48% : While stressing the United Nations Command's responsibility for managing the Demilitarized Zone, he asked, "Where does the Republic of Korea begin and end?
47% : The United Nations Command offered a similar clarification, saying Brunson had been describing the responsibilities assigned to its commander under the armistice agreement in the DMZ and the Joint Security Area.
39% : The United Nations Command moved to quell the controversy, saying there was "no question about the sovereignty of the Republic of Korea."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
