
Thank Hugh Hefner's funding for today's warped sex education lessons
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
20% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
-4% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
34% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : Hefner also donated to Planned Parenthood, the Kinsey Institute itself, and the sex researchers Masters and Johnson.50% : And SIECUS has, since Hefner's grant in the 1960s, become a power player in shaping what American kids learn about sex in public schools.
50% : Under its guidance, lessons that once focused narrowly on the mechanics of reproduction have taken on an activist streak: "Comprehensive sex education" covers gender identity, STIs, pornography, masturbation, plus a whole bunch of acts that have nothing to do with making babies.
48% : No shock then to find Planned Parenthood (another beneficiary of Big Porn) blurring the boundary between childhood innocence and sexual experience.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.