MediaiteTrump Boasts Tariffs Brought South Korea to Negotiating Table -- Then Taunts China: 'We Are Waiting for Their Call'
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-63% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
12% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
43% : " Trump took to Truth Social to describe a conversation with South Korea's acting President Han Duck-soo just ahead of an impending 25% tariff on South Korean exports.25% : Trump finished his message: China also wants to make a deal, badly, but they don't know how to get it started.
21% : Trump continued in his post with a jab at Beijing amid escalating threats of additional 50% tariffs if China does not abandon its own 34% reciprocal levy.
10% : The optimistic line came just hours after China's commerce ministry accused Trump of "blackmail" and his extra 50% tariff a "mistake on top of a mistake."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
