Walter Jacobson's Perspective 9-12-24: For me, it was an OK debate. Trump was Trump and Harris was Harris
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
98% Very Right
- Politician Portrayal
-74% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-10% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
34% : Much of what Harris argued, Trump argued the opposite, which will go on now for about two months, leading to demands for and the possibility of a second debate.20% : Scary zones for Trump.
3% : Trump was Trump in primetime Tuesday night, trashing Harris, describing her as being not up to the job of President.
3% : Harris was Harris, trashing Trump, but reasoning she's not as effective a trasher as Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.