The Guardian Article RatingWhat we get wrong about the Montgomery bus boycott – and what we can learn from it | Jeanne Theoharis
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
65% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-44% Medium Left
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : And it was the WPC, who had been organizing against bus segregation for years, that decided to call a boycott for Monday, the day Parks would be arraigned.60% : But Black Montgomery residents kept at it.With the city trying to break the protest, Gray decided to file a proactive federal case, Browder v Gayle, to challenge Montgomery’s bus segregation, worried that the state would prevent Parks’s appeal after her arrest on the bus.
51% : Parks fundraised for Colvin’s case and encouraged the teenager to take a leadership role in her NAACP Youth Council.But a mass movement did not result, in part because the judge threw out the segregation charge and only found Colvin guilty of assaulting an officer and in part because many adults saw Colvin as too young, poor and feisty to rally behind.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
