
Whistleblower Raises Alarming Allegation: Secret Service Knew of Vulnerabilities in Fence Before Alleged Second Assassination Attempt on Donald Trump - EconoTimes
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-63% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-3% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
35% : Trump, a former president who has consistently polarized public opinion, remains a prominent figure in American politics, and any security breach surrounding him is likely to attract attention from both his supporters and detractors.27% : Security lapses, especially involving high-profile figures like Trump, are not uncommon, but the suggestion of inside involvement raises serious concerns about the integrity of the Secret Service.
25% : The incident reportedly involved a potential breach in security during an event where Trump was in attendance.
23% : The whistleblower's testimony suggests that members of the Secret Service were aware of weaknesses in the perimeter fence but failed to address the issue, leaving Trump exposed to potential threats.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.