
Who won Donald Trump and Kamala Harris's first-ever debate? Our panel reacts | Panelists
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-21% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-12% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
75% : His 2024 version is far more unhinged - lies about the election, lies about immigrants eating pets, lies about abortion laws, lies too many to recount.65% : Harris was at her best when she was able to portray Trump as an out-of-touch elite who doesn't care about ordinary Americans, including his base.
58% : She didn't just introduce herself to Trump - she reintroduced herself to the American public as a strong, competent leader ready to serve as Commander in Chief.
40% : Hopefully, Americans will choose not to put Trump back in the White House, but no matter how bad his performance, he still has a serious chance of winning.
36% : Every time the question was about an issue where Trump has a polling advantage over Harris, like the economy, foreign policy and the Biden administration's record, she would sneak in a line about him and his past that he couldn't help but chase.
35% : All in all, Trump showed who he was: a rightwing authoritarian, and a confused and incompetent one at that.
35% : Trump and Harris appear tied in Pennsylvania while the Democrats hold narrow leads in Michigan and Wisconsin.
33% : Trump garnered the majority of speaking time, but it did him no favor.
32% : I hope CNN's Dana Bash and Jake Tapper, who did a horrendous job "moderating" the June debate between Trump and Biden, were taking notes.
30% : In contrast, Trump appeared undisciplined and unhinged, offering a reminder of the chaotic leadership that defined his time in office.
28% : The choice could not be clearer; according to Trump himself, he has no plan.
28% : Trump was at his most narcissistic, impulsive and racist, lashing out incoherently.
28% : Trump no longer led.
26% : " Trump was flailing.
26% : While Harris sought to uplift and empower, Trump resorted to divisive rhetoric, further alienating a nation in need of healing.
26% : Though they got a little more lenient towards the end, ABC moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis did a brilliant job fact-checking in real time, calling Trump out on his lies about Democrats wanting to execute babies after they're born.
25% : She intelligently called Trump "someone who would rather run on a problem rather than fixing the problem".
22% : Meanwhile, Trump reacted to his own statement that he lost the 2020 election "by a whisker" first by stating: "I said that?" and then by saying he was "being sarcastic".
19% : This debate will not be anywhere near as consequential as the last one, between Biden and Trump, which reoriented an election overnight.
15% : " Harris chivied Trump on abortion and democracy and lambasted him over China and Covid.
7% : Much of the credit for this goes to Harris, who clearly prepared well and expertly baited Trump into his worst areas.
7% : Instead of a debate about policy and plans, what we saw was a debate about Trump, with Harris dancing around her own record and policies to skillfully prosecute the case against Trump instead.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.