News18Why Does India Face 12.5% 'Forced Labour' Tariff While Others Get 10%? USTR Finding Explained
- Bias Rating
8% Center
- Reliability
15% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
20% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-65% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Log in to your account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-9% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : That 10 per cent levy is scheduled to remain in place until around July 24 unless replaced or modified.45% : Washington has repeatedly flagged India's tariff structure, agricultural restrictions, digital regulations and market-access rules as concerns.
41% : Under the proposal, a group of economies, including Canada, the European Union, Mexico, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan and the United Kingdom would face a 10 per cent tariff because they have either full or partial prohibitions against the import of goods made with forced labour.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
