Fox NewsWhy Trump's target should be China, not Panama
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
20% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
68% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-39% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-13% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : The Chinese president's mercantilist strategy, known as the Belt and Road Initiative, relies upon state support and direction.48% : Trump could negotiate a deal with strong environmental, labor and country-of-origin provisions, just like he did with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).
46% : When Trump abandoned the Trans-Pacific Partnership, China became the region's biggest economic partner.
34% : Trump should be dialing up these tough tactics against a big, belligerent country, not bullying a small ally.
18% : Based on my experience in Panama and in Congress, though, I believe Trump is going about this the wrong way.
14% : Donald Trump is threatening to invade Panama.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
