Zero tax position should be revisited - Stabroek News

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

65% : In a fast growing economy the tax base should also be growing, in order to cater to Government social safety net spending in an environment of rising prices that the poor faces.
54% : Zero tax thinking should be revisited.
50% : Higher non-property taxation would be required to service higher debt levels from borrowing.
49% : The tax burden on public sector wages is more likely with a smaller revenue tax base; wage increases would be restrained and some individuals, especially professionals, such as doctors and nurses in the public sector are more likely to move over to private sector jobs or emigrate, as labour-leisure choices are impacted on.
48% : A solution to negative effects on labour market choices is to examine the components of the property tax, namely land, buildings, and other structures, such as warehouses and factory spaces.
48% : A reduced tax base would invite higher levels of government borrowing requirements in a high-growth economy.
46% : A tax on land only, is more likely to avoid land speculation, while mobilizing idle land for development to take place.
44% : It was no surprise that the authorities had ended up with a distorted Petroleum Sharing Agreement with ExxonMobil, allowing zero profits tax that are actually paid to Government.
43% : An elimination of the property tax would set budgetary limits on social spending - transfers to those at the lower end of the income ladder and less subsidies on education and health spending.
42% : A tax on new construction could be eliminated.
40% : Tax thinking should be mindful of the value components in Government tax base and contracts.
21% : Thinking taxes, especially removing a part of Government tax base should be approached with caution as Christopher Ram alluded to in SN-2025-12-22.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.