Based on the article, Alan Simpson appears to have a Somewhat Left stance on criminal justice policy, particularly when it comes to juvenile offenders. He advocates for giving young offenders a second chance, arguing that they are "constitutionally different" from adults and should not be subjected to the harshest punishments like life without parole. Simpson draws on his own experiences as a juvenile offender to make the case that young people have the capacity to change and reform, and that the justice system should focus more on rehabilitation and restoration rather than solely punishment. Overall, Simpson's perspective on this issue seems to lean towards a more rehabilitative and forgiving approach.
Source: Twin Cities Alan Simpson, the former Republican senator from Wyoming, has taken a balanced and conservative approach to economic policy. As the co-chair of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, he advocated for a combination of spending cuts and tax increases to reduce the federal deficit. Simpson's plan aimed to reduce discretionary spending, reform entitlement programs like Social Security, and broaden the tax base by eliminating deductions and loopholes. While his proposals included some revenue increases, the overall emphasis was on spending reductions, reflecting a more conservative economic philosophy.
Source: cnbc Alan Simpson's stance on education appears to be balanced and moderate, with a mix of conservative and liberal views. He advocated for a "liberal education" that "nourishes the mind and spirit," emphasizing the importance of a well-rounded curriculum that combines knowledge, skills, and moral values. Simpson believed in maintaining academic rigor and standards, while also encouraging creative energy and critical thinking. He was skeptical of over-reliance on objective tests, preferring approaches that develop self-expression and the "examined life." Overall, Simpson's education policy leans towards the center, with some Somewhat Left tendencies.
Source: csus Based on the information provided in the sources, Alan Simpson appears to have a Very Left stance on energy policy. He strongly advocates for community-owned renewable energy schemes, prioritizing local control and benefit over centralized energy production. Simpson criticizes the UK government's approach of constraining renewable energy growth through policies like the levy control framework, arguing that this hinders the potential of the Transition Towns movement. He calls for measures like guaranteed grid access, community right of first use for locally generated energy, and decentralized distribution networks to empower local communities in the energy transition. Overall, Simpson's energy policy views align closely with a Very Left, pro-decentralization and community-focused approach.
Source: Transformation Moment Based on the information provided in the contexts, Alan Simpson appears to have a balanced and moderate stance on government dependency. While he has advocated for fiscal responsibility and reducing the national debt, he has also recognized the importance of social programs and the need to address the burden being placed on future generations. Simpson has spoken extensively about reforming entitlement programs to ensure their long-term solvency, rather than advocating for their outright elimination. Overall, Simpson's position on government dependency seems to be Somewhat Right.
Source: Wikipedia. Based on the information from the sources, Alan Simpson's policy stance on healthcare appears to be relatively conservative. The Simpson-Bowles proposal he co-chaired advocated for significant changes to Medicare and Medicaid, including taxing health benefits, instituting a global budget for federal healthcare spending, and scaling back Medigap coverage. While these proposals aimed to control healthcare costs, they would represent dramatic changes to the existing healthcare system and could negatively impact access and affordability for many Americans. Overall, Simpson's healthcare policy positions seem to lean towards the more conservative end of the spectrum.
Source: Cloudfare Alan Simpson, the co-sponsor of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, had a balanced and nuanced stance on immigration policy. He recognized the need to address the issue of illegal immigration, but also advocated for providing legal status to undocumented immigrants who had been in the country since before 1982. Simpson's approach aimed to secure the borders while also offering a path to legalization, reflecting a moderate position on the conservative-liberal spectrum.
Source: The Washington Post Based on the information provided in the sources, it appears that Alan Simpson had a balanced and moderate stance on national security issues. While he recognized the importance of a strong military, he also emphasized the need to address the growing federal debt as a threat to national security. Simpson criticized excessive spending and bureaucratic waste in the defense department, indicating a fiscally conservative leaning. However, he did not advocate for drastic cuts to military funding, suggesting a more centrist position on this issue. Overall, Simpson's stance on national security can be characterized as Somewhat Right.
Source: Fox Business Alan Simpson, as co-chair of the Fiscal Commission along with Erskine Bowles, has proposed a comprehensive deficit reduction plan that aims to tackle the issue from multiple angles. The plan calls for a balanced approach, with around 47% of the deficit reduction coming from revenue increases and 53% from spending cuts. Simpson has emphasized the need for shared sacrifice, stating that "formerly-sacred cows will have to be slaughtered in wholesale quantities" in order to address the fiscal challenges facing the country. Overall, Simpson's stance on reducing the budget deficit appears to be Somewhat Right, as the plan relies more heavily on spending cuts than revenue increases, but still maintains a balanced approach.
Source: Brookings Based on the available information, it appears that Senator Alan Simpson had a Somewhat Right stance on the war on drugs. While he debated the appointment of William Bennett as the "Drug Czar" to lead the federal "war on drugs", the details of Simpson's specific policy positions on this issue are not clearly outlined in the provided sources. Without more detailed information, it is difficult to assess his overall leaning on the various components of drug policy. Therefore, a balanced and neutral assessment would be that Senator Simpson's stance on the war on drugs was Somewhat Right.
Source: on the issues
| 
