Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
News News
Bias Charts - New
Services
Pricing
Bias Meter
Tools
Back
to Politician Ratings
Politician Ratings
Help
As the original politician, when you claim your page and subscribe to our services and Politician platform, you will have access to add and edit your Contact information, Political Stances, Blog, etc.

Richard Pilger

n/a, White House Executive Branch
Elections Crime Branch Director at the Criminal Division of the DOJ

Richard Pilger is the Elections Crime Branch Director at the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. He previously served in several positions as a Senior Trial attorney in the DOJ; he studied English and Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame and earned his J.D from Indiana University. Based on voting history, policy positions, and public statements, Richard Pilger demonstrates a Medium Left political bias. Compare Richard Pilger with other politicians in our Politician Bias Chart.

Analyst Rating
Help
Biasly’s analyst team evaluates politician twitter accounts, voting records, and statements made in the press to determine leanings. Our diverse analyst team includes equal representation from conservative, center, and liberal viewpoints on every article we rate.

Center

A.I. Policy Leanings
Help
Our policy leanings for Richard Pilger show what policies Richard supports and opposes including Richard's conservative and liberal leanings based on the news.

-64% Medium Left

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

A.I. Media Portrayal
Help
The A.I. media portrayal of Richard Pilger shows how positively or negatively the media portrays Richard. Negative and positive sentiment scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores showing that more media companies see Richard in a negative light and higher positive scores showing that more media companies see Richard in a positive light.

100% negative

Richard Pilger’s Policy Stances

Left
Center
Right
  • Criminal Justice
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Gov. Dependency
  • Healthcare
  • Immigration
  • National Security
  • Reduce Budget Deficit
  • War on Drugs
  • Criminal Justice
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Government Dependency
  • Healthcare
  • Immigration
  • National Security
  • Reduce Budget Deficit
  • War on Drugs
Scroll ----->

  • Stances

  • Media Portrayal

  • Policy Leanings

  • News Mentions

  • Creations

  • My Articles

  • Contact

Political Category

Party Leaning

  • Criminal Justice

    Somewhat Left

    Based on the information provided, Richard Pilger's stance on criminal justice appears to be centered and balanced. As the Director of the Election Crimes Branch in the Department of Justice's Criminal Division, Pilger has handled a wide range of public corruption cases at all levels of government, including prosecutions related to bribery, fraud, and vote-buying conspiracies. His work suggests a focus on upholding the integrity of the electoral process and holding public officials accountable, without a clear partisan lean. Overall, Pilger's approach to criminal justice seems to be Somewhat Left.
    Source: PLI

  • Economy

    Center

    The available information does not provide any details on Richard Pilger's policy positions or leanings on economic issues. The sources focus primarily on his career as a federal prosecutor handling public corruption cases, with no mention of his views on economic policy. Without any clear evidence of Pilger's stance on the economy, it is not possible to assess his position on a conservative-liberal scale for this topic.
    Source: PLI

  • Education

    Center

    Based on the available information, there is no clear indication of Richard Pilger's specific policy stance on immigration. The contexts provided do not contain any direct references to Pilger's views or positions on immigration-related issues. Without any substantive evidence, it would be speculative to characterize Pilger's leaning on the immigration policy spectrum. Therefore, no meaningful summary can be provided, and his stance on this topic remains unknown.
    Source: US House of Representatives

  • Energy

    Center

    The available information does not indicate Richard Pilger's specific policy stance or leaning on energy issues. As an attorney and former government official, Pilger's focus appears to have been on public corruption and election crimes, rather than energy policy. Without any direct statements or records of his positions on energy, it is not possible to assess his policy leaning in a balanced and neutral manner. Therefore, no meaningful summary can be provided regarding Pilger's stance on energy policy.
    Source: NPR

  • Government Dependency

    Center

    Based on the information available, there is no clear indication of Richard Pilger's policy stance on government dependency. The provided contexts focus primarily on Pilger's career as a government lawyer and his involvement in election-related investigations, without delving into his views on government dependency. Without any direct statements or policy positions from Pilger on this topic, it is not possible to determine his leaning on a conservative-to-liberal scale regarding government dependency. Therefore, no meaningful summary can be provided.
    Source: Wikipedia

  • Healthcare

    Center

    Based on the information provided, Richard Pilger's policy stance on healthcare appears to be centered and balanced, as he has served in the U.S. Department of Justice's Criminal Division, handling a wide range of public corruption cases rather than directly shaping healthcare policy. His role has focused on enforcing laws and prosecuting crimes, without a clear partisan lean on healthcare issues. Without explicit details on his personal views or policy positions, it is difficult to definitively characterize his stance on the healthcare landscape.
    Source: PLI

  • Immigration

    Center

    The available information does not provide any details on Richard Pilger's specific policy positions or stances on immigration. The contexts focus on Pilger's role as the Director of the Election Crimes Branch at the Department of Justice and his interactions with the IRS regarding potential prosecution of tax-exempt organizations. There is no mention of Pilger's views or positions on immigration policy. Without any relevant information, I am unable to summarize Pilger's policy leaning and stance on immigration or indicate his level of leaning on this specific policy.
    Source: Wikipedia

  • National Security

    Center

    Based on the available information, Richard Pilger's policy stance on national security appears to be centered and neutral. As the Director of the Election Crimes Branch at the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, Pilger's focus seems to have been on investigating election-related crimes rather than broader national security issues. The sources do not indicate any strong partisan leanings or specific policy positions on national security matters. Overall, Pilger's stance on this topic appears to be Center on the conservative-liberal scale.
    Source: Wikipedia

  • Reduce Budget Deficit

    Center

    Based on the information provided in the Wikipedia article, Richard Pilger's stance on reducing the budget deficit is not explicitly stated. However, as a career prosecutor at the Department of Justice, he has focused on investigating and prosecuting public corruption cases, which could indirectly contribute to reducing government waste and inefficiency. Without more specific information on his views regarding fiscal policy and deficit reduction, it is difficult to determine his overall leaning on this issue. Therefore, his stance on reducing the budget deficit is unclear.
    Source: Wikipedia

  • War on Drugs

    Center

    Based on the available information, there is no clear indication of Richard Pilger's specific policy stance on the war on drugs. As the Director of the Election Crimes Branch at the Department of Justice, his focus appears to have been on public corruption and election-related matters rather than drug policy. Without any direct statements or records of his positions on the war on drugs, it is not possible to determine his policy leaning on this issue in a balanced and neutral manner. Therefore, no definitive assessment can be made regarding Pilger's stance on the war on drugs.
    Source: Wikipedia

Why Claim Your Politician Profile?

Claim your profile on Biasly and gain control over how
you’re represented. As a verified politician, you can:

Edit Your Profile

Including your biography and other public-facing information.

Clarify Stances

Customize your stances on this page for certain political issues.

Communicate Directly

Allow voters and users to follow your profile which you can send messages to from the Biasly platform.

Publish Blog Posts

Publish articles, opinion pieces, and important updates directly to your profile.

Upload Materials

Upload campaign materials, images, or supporting documents.

Be Transparent

Share accurate contact details for transparency to your desired audience.

See Advanced Analytics

Track how news outlets cover you with interactive bias charts.

Compare Politicians

Compare your politician profile and stances against other politicians with visual bias charts.

Scan Politician Speeches

Scan your politician speeches, articles with our bias checker. See what leanings you have and how to improve the speech.

If you want to go further, you can also sign up for Biasly’s Politician Bias Analytics Platform to track sentiment,
perception, and bias ratings over time. Email sales@biasly.com to get started, or if you have any questions.

How It Works
  • Claim Profile and Verify Your Identity – Our secure process ensures only authorized individuals can claim their profile.
  • Start Sharing – Once verified, you'll gain full access to customize your politician profile and manage your content.
See a full list of features and pricing for the Politician Analytics Platform pricing page.

Our politician ratings are based on recent news using data science and A.I. technology. We analyze hundreds of articles published by news sources daily to determine politicians and policy leanings.