The Patriot Post
Bias and Reliability

Policy and Issue Framing

The Patriot Post covers issues like the government shutdown, government spending, and foreign policy. When covering issues like immigration, The Patriot Post overtly favors Republican policies and is critical of Democratic ones. For example, here is a quote from the article “The Sanctuary Showdown”:

“If you’re in a Democrat city and hear about a “peaceful” protest, you know it’s not safe to go outside. And now, it’s not safe for law enforcement either. It’s egregious enough for sanctuary cities to forbid local police from aiding federal immigration officials, but to stand down while ICE agents are threatened with violence is something we haven’t seen before.”

This quote simultaneously supports Republican policies by affirming Trump’s use of ICE agents to raid cities, while framing Democratic policies as dangerous.

This preference for conservative perspectives is also seen in their coverage of LGBTQ+ rights. Here is a quote from the article “The Supreme Court Considers ‘Conversion Therapy’”:

“While we’ve banned one kind of conversion, we may be embracing another — just with new branding. The modern version isn’t about turning gay people straight. It’s about turning gay or even straight people transgender.”

The author supports the conservative perspective that gender-affirming care is simply a hoax or Democratic “rebranding” of conversion therapy.

Coverage and Relevance

The Patriot Post’s reporting often touches on key issues central to the media political bias discussion, including the environment and national and local elections. As such, it serves as a compelling case study for examining source bias and news media bias in outlet-focused reporting.

Readers who wish to further explore how The Patriot Post compares with other publications can visit Biasly’s Media Bias Chart to analyze tone and word choice in real time.

Biasly assigns each outlet three key scores:

• Reliability Score – Reflects factual accuracy
• AI Bias Score – Generated via natural language processing
• Analyst Bias Score – Assessed by human political analysts

These scores are based on seven core metrics: Tone, Tendency, Diction, Author Check, Selection/Omission, Expediency Bias, and Accuracy. These elements help analysts and algorithms evaluate the political attitude conveyed by each article.

Biasly’s Bias Meter ranges from -100% (most left) to +100% (most right), with 0% indicating neutrality. The system evaluates individual articles based on political terms, policies, figures, and sentiment to calculate precise bias ratings.

Is The Patriot Post Politically Biased?

The Patriot Post earns a Medium Right rating for its AI Bias Score and a Medium Right for its Analyst Bias Score. The Analyst Bias Score is generated by reviewers from liberal, moderate, and conservative backgrounds. Analysts reviewed many The Patriot Post articles and noted preferences in areas like coverage of conservative politicians and policy topics. Analysts also noted that The Patriot Post rarely portrays balanced and objective articles, instead preferring to frame issues through word choice and source selection to support a Republican standpoint.

For example, in the article “The Demos ARE Crazy,” the author uses words like “radical Islamist” to describe Zohran Mamdani, and words like “crazy” and attributes “Trump Derangement Syndrome” to leftists in general. Utilizing inflammatory language like this indicates that the article is not meant to portray arguments neutrally, but rather to sway the reader to support the author’s perspective.

This bias score is determined through natural language processing that evaluates the tone, word choice, and opinion embedded in the reporting. Recent AI evaluations highlight right-leaning narratives in articles discussing the Republican Party and LGBTQ+ issues.

Analysis of Bias in The Patriot Post Online Articles

To evaluate this, we can analyze select The Patriot Post articles through several of Biasly’s bias rating criteria: Tone, Tendency, Author, Diction, and Expediency Bias.

• Tone: The overall attitude conveyed by the article
• Diction: Specific word choices made by the writer
• Author: The background and social presence of the journalist
• Tendency: Patterns of bias in the writer’s broader body of work
• Expediency Bias: Quick visual or textual indicators like headlines and photos that imply bias

Source: The Patriot Post

An example of expediency bias can be seen in the article “Weaponizing the DOJ? Say It Ain’t So!”. The photo above is the cover photo for this article. Combined with the headline, it is clear that the article is taking on a right-leaning stance. Both of these aspects combined are inflammatory and meant to be controversial. Furthermore, there is very little informational value from either the headline or the photo. This means that the purpose of the headline and the photo is likely just to draw your attention, rather than be informative. The author also states, “Democrats pretend they’re holier than thou while they stab thou in the back,” which suggests the author’s negative view of Democrats. This insinuates that the author has personal biases against Democratic politicians, which may influence his editorial standards.

Source:  The Patriot Post

An example of how diction can portray bias is seen in the article “Trump Wins Peace, ‘Loses’ Nobel”. Here is a quote from the article:

“Blessed are the peacemakers, right? Wrong. At least not if your name is Donald Trump. The Nobel Peace Prize was awarded today in Oslo, and our 47th president was the most deserving recipient. There wasn’t a close second.”

By framing Trump as a “peacemaker” and “most deserving,” it is clear that the article uses language to imply that Trump was the right recipient for the Nobel Peace Prize. Therefore, this article has a right-leaning bias. Furthermore, the cover photo of the article aims to frame Trump more directly with this idea of him being a peace-maker, which further suggests a conservative bias to this article.

Source:  The Patriot Post

An example of how tone can portray bias can be seen in the article “Why Aren’t ‘Ceasefire Now!’ Activists Celebrating Trump’s Gaza Peace Deal?”. Here are some quotes from the article:

“Everyone understands that slogans such as “Free Palestine!” and “Ceasefire Now!”, are just euphemisms for a Hamas victory. Never has that been more evident than today.”

By framing left-leaning phrases like “Free Palestine” and “Ceasefire Now” as merely euphemisms for “Hamas victory,” the article is clearly critical of Democratic perspectives.

“As of this writing, “ceasefire” champion Bernie Sanders, who has spread the Gaza “genocide” hoax hundreds of times to his millions of followers, has said absolutely nothing about the Trump deal.”

By calling the Democratic viewpoint of the Gaza genocide a “hoax”, this also signals a right-leaning bias. With quotes like these present throughout the article, it is clear that the tone of the article is right-leaning. The cover photo of this article also aims to suggest that Democrats are terrorist sympathizers. This further supports a conservative bias rating for this article.

An author’s public posts can contextualize perspective. However, they do not by themselves prove article-level bias. While their personal viewpoints do not guarantee that their articles are biased, it does help give you a snapshot. For example, here is a post from The Patriot Post writer Samantha Koch’s X page:

I would like to thank Liberal women for their online meltdowns after Trump won.

Shaving heads, 4B, screaming, crying, destroying property…

I appreciate you. #USAElection2024 #LiberalMeltdown pic.twitter.com/e4ByNAZut0

— OutspokenSamantha (@Outspoken_Sam) November 7, 2024

This post, which is overtly critical of liberal women, suggests that the author may have a personal right-leaning bias. Knowing this can be helpful when reading her articles.

Another way to analyze bias is to look at an author’s previous writings. While this does not guarantee that an author is biased, it does help to see if they have a tendency to favor certain perspectives. For example, here are some previous headlines from Ann Coulter, a contributor who has written a number of articles for The Patriot Post:

• “Blame Social Media, Guns, Vacuums — Anything but Transgenders”
• “The Ineffable Brilliance of Stephen Miller”
• “If Illegals Are Illegal, Why Are Their Babies Citizens?”

Her previous articles, which are critical of issues that Democrats endorse, suggest that Coulter may have a right-leaning bias in her articles.

Analysis of The Patriot Post Opinion Articles

The Patriot Post does not have an explicit opinion section on its website. This means that readers should be careful about what they are reading. This is because without the distinction between factual and opinion reporting, it is unclear what the editorial standards of each article are. Therefore, readers should utilize Biasly’s bias criteria whenever possible.

Who Owns The Patriot Post?

The Patriot Post is owned by Publius Press Inc. However, their ownership model is mysterious. The name of their owner is listed on The Patriot Post’s website as Mark Caldwell, which is a pseudonym for Mark Alexander. Furthermore, the news outlet operates in a non-profit model. It does not run advertisements and only accepts donations from small donors. Alexander has a history of supporting Republican causes, which may suggest a right-leaning bias for The Patriot Post.

Who Funds %SOURCE_NAME%?

According to its own disclosures, The Patriot Post is funded entirely by voluntary reader contributions, with no advertising accepted, and claims to be free of political, special-interest, or parent-organization financial backing. The publication runs annual fundraising drives and emphasises its grassroots donor base as the primary source of operating revenue.

Because The Patriot Post does not use advertising or corporate sponsors, it avoids one common source of outside influence. Instead, it relies on reader donations. Most of these contributions come from an audience that shares the publication’s ideological views. This can shape editorial priorities. It may affect which topics are chosen, how stories are framed, and how resources are allocated.

The Patriot Post  states that it maintains full editorial independence. It also says that it accepts no corporate or political influence. Even so, any funding model can create incentives. When donations come mainly from like-minded supporters, it can lead to subtle pressures or framing patterns over time. Readers should keep this in mind when evaluating coverage.

How to Evaluate Bias

Although Biasly rates The Patriot Post as Medium Right, it’s important to remember that bias can vary from article to article. This complexity underscores the importance of examining each article individually. So, let’s learn how to evaluate media bias.

Recognizing media bias requires awareness and critical thinking. Often, readers trust news sources that affirm their existing beliefs—a psychological tendency known as confirmation bias. This makes it harder to identify slanted narratives or one-sided reporting.

To combat this, it’s essential to challenge your assumptions by consulting multiple viewpoints and verifying news through third-party analysis. Tools like Biasly’s media bias ratings allow readers to compare the same news story across the political spectrum.

Ultimately, bias isn’t always a matter of what is said; it’s also about what is left out, how topics are framed, and which stories are chosen for coverage. Learning to recognize these patterns can help readers make more informed decisions and develop greater media literacy.

To start comparing news outlets and gain a better understanding of bias, sign up for Biasly’s Media Bias & News Analytics Platform to see how stories vary between sources.

So How Does The Patriot Post Fare in Its Reliability?

The political reliability index developed by Biasly assesses both accuracy and trustworthiness. The Patriot Post currently holds Average Reliability Score, which is calculated as a weighted average of:

• Fact Analysis Score – Evaluates the accuracy of claims, facts, and evidence.
• Source Analysis Score – Assesses the number, diversity, and credibility of sources and quotes used.

The Patriot Post’s Source Analysis Score is Average at 66% Reliable. This suggests moderate trustworthiness in its sourcing practices. The score is AI-generated and considers quote length, frequency, diversity, and quality.

The Fact Analysis Score is yet to be finalized. This score will further determine how well The Patriot Post supports its claims, addresses selection and omission bias, and presents verifiable evidence. Until this is available, readers are encouraged to perform their own evaluations using Biasly’s media bias tools.

While The Patriot Post leans toward factual reporting, occasional lapses—such as unbalanced viewpoints or incomplete data—can affect its reliability rating. These nuances emphasize the importance of analyzing individual articles.

The Patriot Post’s Accuracy and Reliability

According to Biasly’s analysis, The Patriot Post maintains Average Reliability Score, but individual articles may vary significantly. Let’s dive into the details.

Two common types of bias that affect factuality include:

• Selection Bias – Highlighting or omitting stories to fit a particular narrative.
• Omission Bias – Leaving out differing perspectives or relevant details to skew perception.

Biasly’s accuracy ratings use a scale from 1% (least accurate) to 100% (most accurate). Factors include the presence of supporting evidence, internal and external reliable sources, and balanced viewpoints.

For example, The Patriot Post’s article “Why Mamdani Is a Communist — Not a Socialist” has a low reliability score because it omits any center or left-leaning perspectives. For example, they only cite Alan Dershowitz and Brandon Straka, who are both considered to be right-leaning. This also causes the issue of the article missing the point. It criticizes Mamdani without ever referring to any of his policies or any perspectives regarding them.

Furthermore, the article lacks sources in general, only explicitly citing the two above-mentioned right-leaning individuals. There is also the issue of adding statistics without linking to the source of the data. For example, the article mentions a United Nations statistic, but does not link to where the data comes from. Even if the statistic is true, an article that lacks explicit linking of its sources within the article suggests a low editorial standard.

Analysis of Reliability in The Patriot Post’s Online News Articles

The Patriot Post aims to “sustain the endowment of American Liberty in this generation and extend it to the next by first, advocating for individual rights and responsibilities; second, supporting the restoration of constitutional limits on government and the judiciary; and third, promoting free enterprise, national defense, and traditional American values”.

This message is not directly linked to any editorial standard or aim for what The Patriot Post’s news articles are meant to convey. This suggests that The Patriot Post does not operate under a unified editorial standard, and therefore, each article must be analyzed for bias individually. However, readers should distinguish between news reporting and opinion pieces to evaluate credibility effectively.

Quality of Sources and Facts Used

The Patriot Post’s articles often skew in how comprehensively they present opposing viewpoints. For example, here are the perspectives referenced in the article “Attempted Kavanaugh Assassin Gets Break for ‘Trans’ Claim”:

• The Patriot Post, American news outlet, right-leaning
• Coreen Mao and Thomas Sullivan, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, centrist
• Deborah Boardman, district judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, left-leaning
• Fox News, an American news outlet, right-leaning
• Hot Air, American political news blog, right-leaning
• The Federalist, an American news outlet, right-leaning

The Patriot Post, Fox News, Hot Air, and The Federalist are considered right-leaning. Mao and Sullivan can be considered centrist. Boardman can be considered left-leaning. While this source may seem like it has an ideological spread in terms of its sources, Boardman is only referenced to be criticized, rather than for her perspective to be merely presented:

“But according to Judge Boardman, there were “mitigating factors.” Because with a liberal, female judge, there are always “mitigating factors” no matter how heinous the crime.”

The article does not attempt to expand upon these mitigating factors or present them to the audience. These mitigating factors only serve one goal for the author, which is to be a symbol for the author to criticize. Because of this and their preference for right-leaning sources, this article has a lower reliability. Rather than presenting facts from multiple ideological sources, the article attempts to frame the issue from a conservative viewpoint by only including conservative perspectives.

Selection and Omission Bias

One example of omission bias can be seen in the article “Palisades Pyro”. The article only references right-leaning sources like the New York Post and The Daily Caller. By omitting any left-leaning sources, the article attempts to frame the issue from a conservative viewpoint, rather than from an objective, neutral one.

An example of selection bias can be seen in the article “Government Shutdown: Smokescreen for Democratic Party Bankrupt of Ideas”. The article highlights conservative perspectives, and even when it mentions a Democratic perspective, it frames it in a way to support the perspectives it is highlighting:

“Democrats, she advises (Donna Brazile, former Democratic National Committee chair), should say they stand for ‘affordability.’ But what Democrats mean by affordability is the use of government subsidies to disguise true costs.”

By restating Brazile’s statements in her own terms, the author of this article adapts a Democratic perspective to fit the narrative that the author wants to highlight. Therefore, this article is right-leaning.

Another example of omission bias can be seen in the article “Jack Smith’s Democrat Spy Ring”. By omitting liberal perspectives, this article does not attempt to portray the issue neutrally, but rather through a conservative perspective:

“As Iowa Republican and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley posted yesterday in a tweet: “This document shows the Biden FBI spied on 8 of my Republican Senate colleagues during its Arctic Frost investigation into ‘election conspiracy.’ Arctic Frost later became Jack Smith’s elector case against Trump. BIDEN FBI WEAPONIZATION = WORSE THAN WATERGATE.”

By allowing only conservative perspectives to be presented, this article does not allow the reader to grasp the full issue, which includes arguments from a liberal perspective, but rather only from a conservative perspective.

So, is The Patriot Post Reliable?

Overall, The Patriot Post can be considered to be an outlet that is moderately reliable. 

As media literacy improves, readers can more easily detect issues with selection bias, omission bias, and factuality. To strengthen your ability to assess reliability across the political spectrum, use Biasly’s News Bias Checker to compare how multiple outlets report the same story.

This empowers you to consume more accurate, balanced, and dependable news.

Related Tools and Resource Pages

To better understand how The Patriot Post fits into the broader media landscape, we recommend exploring these helpful resources:

• Media Bias Chart: See where The Patriot Post ranks among hundreds of media outlets across the political spectrum.
• Political Bias Chart: Visualize political slants of news sources across various policy areas.
• Journalist Bias Analytics Platform: Explore how individual journalists contribute to bias within their publications.
• Politician Bias Analytics Platform: Compare how politicians are framed differently by The Patriot Post and other outlets.
• Media Literacy Education Platform: Learn how to critically assess media sources, bias techniques, and news reliability.