Takeaways from the third Republican presidential debate | CNN Politics
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
50% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-36% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
-42% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
66% : Ramaswamy left no doubt where he stood, issuing a lengthy rebuke of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky while accusing the war-torn country of harboring Nazism and anti-democratic beliefs.59% : As Haley stated that comments she made praising China were in response to her work during her tenure as US ambassador to the United Nations negotiating North Korea sanctions with Beijing, Ramaswamy interrupted to say that she called China a “great friend.”
55% : Christie said Tuesday’s results were what the constitutional framers wanted and what anti-abortion advocates had hoped for in overturning Roe v. Wade: letting the states decide.
50% : DeSantis, meanwhile, seemed to put Tuesday’s losses at the feet of anti-abortion groups, saying they had been “caught flat-footed on these referenda.”
40% : Abortion wasn’t the only divisive topic that got short shrift in Miami.
35% : And while those questions were surely worth debating – even if the candidates largely agreed on top lines like supporting Israel and opposing Hamas, Iran and China – the effect was ultimately disorienting: If the GOP is going to take back the White House, why ignore the political hurdles standing in its way?
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
CNN