Other than the wealth of very inflammatory language, the article connects Microsoft to the actions of the IDF. Their main source of proof is Microsoft employing former IDF members and buying Israeli tech companies, but this does not necessarily imply that Microsoft is complicit in Israeli war crimes. The article then blows the accusations out of proportion by accusing Microsoft of supplying nearly all of Israel's technology, including facial recognition technology. In general, the article uses emotionally charged language and ignores Microsoft’s public denials and lack of direct evidence linking its products to specific harm, ultimately failing to provide a logical or factual basis for its accusations.