The article exhibits a clear right-leaning bias through its framing and language. It emphasizes Republican criticism of the Michigan Democrats' proposed bill, using emotionally charged terms like “attack on law enforcement” and quoting officials who accuse Democrats of caring more about criminals than victims. Democratic perspectives are underrepresented and given less space, while rebuttals from ICE and DHS are detailed and framed as authoritative. The article also draws a contrast between the current proposal and past COVID-era mask mandates to imply hypocrisy, without fully exploring the differing legal contexts. For context, fines during COVID were implemented in a public-health push. At the same time, these proposals to remove masking can either be viewed as endangering and doxxing law enforcement, or holding immigration enforcement accountable for potentially illegal or questionable actions.