Daily Report

The Federalist article about First Choice Women’s Resource Centers is misleading not because the basic facts are wrong, but because of how the story is framed. It labels New Jersey’s subpoena as “Democrat lawfare,” suggesting political targeting, even though court records show the subpoena is part of a standard consumer-protection investigation. The article also leaves out important context about why the state began looking into the center in the first place, including concerns that it may have misrepresented its services to clients and donors. By using loaded language and only presenting the center’s viewpoint, the article creates the impression that the investigation is strictly political, which can mislead readers about the real regulatory issues at play.