I voted yes to this poll because there are a variety of social impacts that come with automation. The more that we develop our technology, the more automated processes become, thus raising ethical …Read MoreI voted yes to this poll because there are a variety of social impacts that come with automation. The more that we develop our technology, the more automated processes become, thus raising ethical concerns and job scarcity. Automation is an issue that has been prevalent since the Industrial Revolution. Machines were developed to increase productivity, and many jobs were lost because of this, but new roles were created, such as ones that involve the maintenance of machines. Today, many automation tasks are being completed by AI, which has caused fear of job loss amongst many. Many technological career roles require education, whether that be from a university or certification, which many people around the world may not have access to. There are many nuanced takes when it comes to automation, but overall, I agree with a global sentiment over this issue, as it has become increasingly prevalent in the past decade.Read Less
Yes, I do think that it is necessary for there to be a global response to the social impact of automation because it affects economies, labor markets, and societies worldwide. As technology starts to …Read MoreYes, I do think that it is necessary for there to be a global response to the social impact of automation because it affects economies, labor markets, and societies worldwide. As technology starts to replace human tasks in manufacturing, logistics, and even some white collar jobs, a lot of people will face job displacement and insecurity. A coordinated international approach can help ensure a fair distribution of the technological benefits that come from automation to ensure that one sector of the work force won’t be left behind,Read Less
I don’t think a global response is necessary; rather, each country should address the social impacts of automation based on its own conditions. Automation can be beneficial or harmful depending on …Read MoreI don’t think a global response is necessary; rather, each country should address the social impacts of automation based on its own conditions. Automation can be beneficial or harmful depending on how it is applied, and these conditions vary significantly across nations. For instance, in countries with aging populations and a shortage of young workers, automation can enhance productivity and offset labor deficits. Similarly, nations lacking multilingual or globally experienced professionals may benefit from language model automation. Because automation interacts differently with each country’s demographic, economic, and social structure, responses should be designed and implemented at the national level rather than through a single global framework.Read Less
Yes, I do think that there should be a global response to the social impacts of automation. As automation transforms industries, jobs, and even individual tasks once performed by people, it reshapes …Read MoreYes, I do think that there should be a global response to the social impacts of automation. As automation transforms industries, jobs, and even individual tasks once performed by people, it reshapes our economies and social structures. So, coordinating efforts internationally might help to ensure the protection of workers and vulnerable communities that depend on the jobs most affected by automation. Additionally, collaborating to develop a global response can help promote a balance between human employment and the efficiency and innovation automation brings our society.Read Less
A global response could be useful as automation really changes industries and something should be done to handle it properly. Establishing a global response would ensure many countries know the limits …Read MoreA global response could be useful as automation really changes industries and something should be done to handle it properly. Establishing a global response would ensure many countries know the limits of technology in job industries.Read Less
I voted yes to this poll because there are a variety of social impacts that come with automation. The more that we develop our technology, the more automated processes become, thus raising ethical …Read MoreI voted yes to this poll because there are a variety of social impacts that come with automation. The more that we develop our technology, the more automated processes become, thus raising ethical concerns and job scarcity. Automation is an issue that has been prevalent since the Industrial Revolution. Machines were developed to increase productivity, and many jobs were lost because of this, but new roles were created, such as ones that involve the maintenance of machines. Today, many automation tasks are being completed by AI, which has caused fear of job loss amongst many. Many technological career roles require education, whether that be from a university or certification, which many people around the world may not have access to. There are many nuanced takes when it comes to automation, but overall, I agree with a global sentiment over this issue, as it has become increasingly prevalent in the past decade. Read Less
Yes, I do think that it is necessary for there to be a global response to the social impact of automation because it affects economies, labor markets, and societies worldwide. As technology starts to …Read MoreYes, I do think that it is necessary for there to be a global response to the social impact of automation because it affects economies, labor markets, and societies worldwide. As technology starts to replace human tasks in manufacturing, logistics, and even some white collar jobs, a lot of people will face job displacement and insecurity. A coordinated international approach can help ensure a fair distribution of the technological benefits that come from automation to ensure that one sector of the work force won’t be left behind, Read Less
I don’t think a global response is necessary; rather, each country should address the social impacts of automation based on its own conditions. Automation can be beneficial or harmful depending on …Read MoreI don’t think a global response is necessary; rather, each country should address the social impacts of automation based on its own conditions. Automation can be beneficial or harmful depending on how it is applied, and these conditions vary significantly across nations. For instance, in countries with aging populations and a shortage of young workers, automation can enhance productivity and offset labor deficits. Similarly, nations lacking multilingual or globally experienced professionals may benefit from language model automation. Because automation interacts differently with each country’s demographic, economic, and social structure, responses should be designed and implemented at the national level rather than through a single global framework. Read Less
Yes, I do think that there should be a global response to the social impacts of automation. As automation transforms industries, jobs, and even individual tasks once performed by people, it reshapes …Read MoreYes, I do think that there should be a global response to the social impacts of automation. As automation transforms industries, jobs, and even individual tasks once performed by people, it reshapes our economies and social structures. So, coordinating efforts internationally might help to ensure the protection of workers and vulnerable communities that depend on the jobs most affected by automation. Additionally, collaborating to develop a global response can help promote a balance between human employment and the efficiency and innovation automation brings our society. Read Less
A global response could be useful as automation really changes industries and something should be done to handle it properly. Establishing a global response would ensure many countries know the limits …Read MoreA global response could be useful as automation really changes industries and something should be done to handle it properly. Establishing a global response would ensure many countries know the limits of technology in job industries. Read Less