Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
TheBlaze Article Rating

Why California's 'model state' is a warning, not a goal | Blaze Media

  • Bias Rating
  • Reliability

    80% ReliableGood

  • Policy Leaning

    18% Somewhat Right

  • Politician Portrayal

    -40% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

4% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

65% : In 1971, the economist John Kenneth Galbraith described the state government as run by "a proud, competent civil service," enjoying some of "the best school systems in the country.
60% : Public sector employment is growing at about the same pace as jobs overall in California, but over the decade at twice the national pace.
53% : The state mandates greenhouse gas reductions but leaves implementation in the hands of state agencies closely aligned with the green lobby.
50% : The Tax Foundation's 2019 State Business Tax Climate Index, which evaluates taxes in five categories, also lists California at No. 49, with only New Jersey trailing.
45% : " Ironically, the state's corruption and decline have been expressed through policies long touted as symbols of progressive enlightenment and virtue -- the odd marriage of oligarchal wealth and woke political consciousness some describe as "San Francisco gentry liberalism.
45% : Newsom's dogged emphasis on climate change -- and achieving "carbon neutrality" by 2045 -- has meant massive subsidies for wind and solar, mandates to reduce personal car use by nearly three times the temporary cuts caused by pandemic lockdowns, electrification of home appliances at a cost of many thousands of dollars per household, and even cuts to dairy and livestock emissions with technology mandates, accelerating the relocation of these food producers to other states and increasing food prices. To justify the pain, state regulators estimated that paying for these changes today would prevent future climate damage, all of which depends on highly uncertain projections spanning, in some cases, hundreds of years in the future.
45% : Progressive climate, labor, and tax policies have chased a broad range of companies out of the state, including an array of leading companies tied to professional services and engineering: Jacobs Engineering, Parsons, Bechtel, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Charles Schwab, and McKesson.
45% : Oddly, Trump could force needed policy changes in order to bring in federal help -- something Newsom has already done in regard to water policy.
39% : In March 2024, fish that state biologists confidently released into the restored river perished in a mass "die-off" within two days.
31% : "Over the last 10 years," the Times reported, "576 public officials in California have been convicted on federal corruption charges, according to Justice Department reports, exceeding the number of cases in states better known for public corruption, including New York, New Jersey, and Illinois.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link