Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
The Guardian Article Rating

Trump and Carney to meet at White House in closely watched encounter

  • Bias Rating

    10% Center

  • Reliability

    60% ReliableAverage

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -37% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

7% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

64% : And while the president had sometimes called the prime minister a "very nice guy", Trump also called Trudeau "two-faced" after he was revealed on video leading the laughter at Trump's expense at a Nato summit.
57% : I suspect that immediately, Trump will look at Carney as a kind of 'super banker' and see him in a positive light," he said.
55% : Vibe at meeting could hint at future relationship between the two countries and their two leaders Canada's prime minister, Mark Carney, was due to meet with US president, Donald Trump, on Tuesday in a closely watched encounter at the White House that could hint at the future relationship between the two countries and their two leaders.
48% : During his victory speech last week, Carney used one of his campaign's most frequently delivered lines, telling exuberant supporters Trump wanted to "break us, so that America can own us".
47% : "Trade negotiations are never completely static and hopefully he can present his negotiations with Trump as something that is better for Canada, and not simply as bending the knee to President Trump.
44% : He pushed back when Trump questioned our sovereignty, but that push back would be something the president understands, because that's how he behaves.
42% : "If Carney presents himself as making concessions to Trump to preserve the trading relationship between the two countries, the Conservative party will be able to take advantage of this," said Hurl.
41% : Carney also used his first post-election press conference to once again quash any idea Canada was interested in becoming the 51st US state, a proposal repeatedly floated by Trump.
36% : In Trudeau's final days as prime minister, Trump repeatedly derided him as "governor" of Canada.
32% : "With Trump, you're just never sure on any day where he is, what's going on in his head and who was the last person to talk to him before in the meeting," said Robertson.
30% : "And Carney's also been very careful not to be personally critical of Trump, beyond talking about him that we're a sovereign country, and this is how we're doing stuff.
28% : Still, Carney's "antagonistic" rhetoric towards Trump might be something he might regret when faced with the economic realities of Canada's dependence on the United States, said Ryan Hurl, an assistant professor of political science at the University of Toronto.
27% : Over the weekend, Trump said it was "highly unlikely" he would use military force to annex Canada, a key trading partner and political ally.
25% : "Trump has probably overreached on trade issues and we're really starting to see the push back now.
18% : Meanwhile, Trump is also starting to face domestic pressure: his decision to launch a trade war with allies and foes alike has started to harm him in public opinion as American companies warn they were prepared to raise costs for consumers.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link