Wall Street Journal Article RatingA Year-End Surprise: A Tax Bill on Top of Your Mutual-Fund Losses
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
40% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
16% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
45% : This technique, known as a "skip," avoids tax on the capital-gain payout.42% : You owe taxes when you've lost money, and you have less invested going forward," says Mark Wilson, a financial adviser with Mile Wealth Management who tracks large mutual fund distributions at CapGainsValet.com.
42% : But many do reinvest, and either way fundholders owe taxes that cut into assets when down markets are also shrinking them.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.