
Critics say Arizona social equity marijuana program did 'opposite' of intention
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
24% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
59% : Although the state once touted its social equity program as a national model, marijuana industry experts say this isn't the outcome Arizona voters wanted when they approved recreational cannabis in 2020.59% : Voters legalized recreational marijuana through Prop. 207, also known as the "Smart and Safe Arizona Act," in 2020.
54% : Among the criteria: earn an annual income less than 400% of the federal poverty level, be affected by the enforcement of previous marijuana laws or related to someone who had, or live in a ZIP code that experienced a disproportionate effect from previous marijuana law enforcement.
50% : Prop. 207 was supposed to help address decades-long inequities, especially those associated with the war on drugs.
46% : But it's also the Voter Protection Act that, a little bit, prevents them from improving upon it.
42% : "The Legislature would love to do away with it, and it's the Voter Protection Act that prevents them from doing away with it.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.