Letters to the editor: 'I can't refer to these people as leaders.' Politicians turn on carbon pricing, plus other letters to the editor for Sept. 17
- Bias Rating
30% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
55% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
28% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
4% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
6% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
43% : "If we can come up with a plan that's going to cost our people, our population, less money and be better health care than Obamacare, then I would absolutely do it," he said.24% : David Poulton, PhD candidate, School of the Environment, University of Queensland; CalgaryRe "The victorious Harris should resist the urge to debate Trump again" (Opinion, Sept. 12): Columnist Lawrence Martin suggests that it is hard for Kamala Harris to rebut a line of attack asking why she and Joe Biden have not done more of what she is advocating for during their 3.5 years in office.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.