
Letters to the editor: 'I can't refer to these people as leaders.' Politicians turn on carbon pricing, plus other letters to the editor for Sept. 17
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
28% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
4% Positive
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
6% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
43% : "If we can come up with a plan that's going to cost our people, our population, less money and be better health care than Obamacare, then I would absolutely do it," he said.24% : David Poulton, PhD candidate, School of the Environment, University of Queensland; Calgary Re "The victorious Harris should resist the urge to debate Trump again" (Opinion, Sept. 12): Columnist Lawrence Martin suggests that it is hard for Kamala Harris to rebut a line of attack asking why she and Joe Biden have not done more of what she is advocating for during their 3.5 years in office.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.