Clarence Thomas should resign from the supreme court, for the good of the court | Steven Greenhouse

View Original Article
Published: May 24, 2023
Category:
A.I. Bias Rating :

-4% Center

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Policy Leaning:

10% Center

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Politician Portrayal:

N/A

Opposite Viewpoint:

Bias Score Analysis:

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.


Policy Leaning Analysis:


Politician Portrayal Analysis:

This article includes the following Politician Portrayal sentiments, providing an average sentiment of 0% Neutral and bias score of -50% Liberal:

1 negative sentiment for Donald Trump
1 negative sentiment for Joseph McCarthy
1 negative sentiment for Walter Mondale
1 negative sentiment for Joseph Tydings
1 negative sentiment for Richard Nixon


Policies:

Religious Freedom

Politicians:

Donald Trump
Joseph McCarthy
Walter Mondale
Joseph Tydings
Richard Nixon

Sentiments

12% "Fortas was pilloried for receiving $20,000 in fees (worth $165,000 in today's dollars) to consult for a foundation that focused on civil rights and ..."
-14% Fortas denied any wrongdoing, but that didn't stop prominent Democratic senators like Walter Mondale and Joseph Tydings from joining the call for him to ..."
-14% Fortas denied any wrongdoing, but that didn't stop prominent Democratic senators like Walter Mondale and Joseph Tydings from joining the call for him to ..."
-14% Fortas denied any wrongdoing, but that didn't stop prominent Democratic senators like Walter Mondale and Joseph Tydings from joining the call for him to ..."
-32% Too many Republicans eagerly excuse Thomas's greedy, self-serving, illegal behavior, just as too many eagerly excuse Trump's greedy, sexist, racist, dishonest and illegal behavior."
-36% All this reminds me of the famous question - "Have you no sense of decency?" - that helped bring down an earlier corrupt, dishonest ..."


*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

56% : Fortas was pilloried for receiving $20,000 in fees (worth $165,000 in today's dollars) to consult for a foundation that focused on civil rights and religious freedom.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link