Is it necessary for countries to adopt a basic healthcare system in order to improve public health. No matter the country if it is under developed or not there should still be a healthcare plan for …Read MoreIs it necessary for countries to adopt a basic healthcare system in order to improve public health. No matter the country if it is under developed or not there should still be a healthcare plan for individuals who need to be taken care of.Read Less
Yes and I don’t know why both parties in America largely work against this when our healthcare system is arguably the most broken of any developed country.
Although I said yes, how do we define “basic” healthcare access? A general practitioner? An obstetrician and a free hospital stay after childbirth? Free annual blood tests? A dental check-up? I’ve …Read MoreAlthough I said yes, how do we define “basic” healthcare access? A general practitioner? An obstetrician and a free hospital stay after childbirth? Free annual blood tests? A dental check-up? I’ve listed just a few things I consider basic, but I’m sure others have different ideas of what “basic” means.Read Less
I think, in general, it’s not necessary for every country to adopt, but I do think it is the case that larger countries with large income disparities would likely see the most improvement with …Read MoreI think, in general, it’s not necessary for every country to adopt, but I do think it is the case that larger countries with large income disparities would likely see the most improvement with universal basic healthcare plans.Read Less
While universal healthcare is a solution to gaps in the ability to obtain healthcare based on financial status, a country must first achieve a certain level of stability that is not viable for every …Read MoreWhile universal healthcare is a solution to gaps in the ability to obtain healthcare based on financial status, a country must first achieve a certain level of stability that is not viable for every country in order to pursue Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Government-provided healthcare suffers in quality and increases wait times for important procedures and is naturally connected to other government priorities, while privatized healthcare incentivizes individual excellence. That is not to say that privatized healthcare is excellent, as it clearly struggles to meet needs as things stand. I do not believe adopting universal basic healthcare is necessary to improve public health outcomes, as other methods, such as improving incentives for hospital systems, can also prove effective.Read Less
I wouldn’t say that it is “necessary” for countries to adopt universal basic healthcare in order to improve public health outcomes. I think that there are alternative options that can also improve …Read MoreI wouldn’t say that it is “necessary” for countries to adopt universal basic healthcare in order to improve public health outcomes. I think that there are alternative options that can also improve public health like targeted programs and non-universal systems, however, a universal basic healthcare system definitely increases access and reduces health inequalities. It is important to note the concerns about the funding or potential consequences like longer wait times.Read Less
Absolutely, no one should be denying that there is a direct and obvious connection between comprehensive healthcare and improved public health outcomes. UBH allows for a more preventative approach …Read MoreAbsolutely, no one should be denying that there is a direct and obvious connection between comprehensive healthcare and improved public health outcomes. UBH allows for a more preventative approach (checkups, regular appointments for minor issues) rather than a reactionary one or a grave last resort. To avoid the downfalls of UBH, I can see a system where there could be a privatized *option* rather than exclusively public healthcare. But, that could also just lead to a repeat of the system America already has now, where the better service providers just move to the privatized clinics and replicate the class stratification. Not sure how that would play out. Regardless, access to healthcare, especially in “developed” countries, should be a human right.Read Less
I think the crucial part of this question is “to improve public health outcomes”. If you look at the health outcomes of countries with Universal Healthcare and those without, it is quite undeniable …Read MoreI think the crucial part of this question is “to improve public health outcomes”. If you look at the health outcomes of countries with Universal Healthcare and those without, it is quite undeniable that improving health outcomes would require *everyone* have a basic amount of healthcare, no matter how rich or poor they are.Read Less
Is it necessary for countries to adopt a basic healthcare system in order to improve public health. No matter the country if it is under developed or not there should still be a healthcare plan for …Read MoreIs it necessary for countries to adopt a basic healthcare system in order to improve public health. No matter the country if it is under developed or not there should still be a healthcare plan for individuals who need to be taken care of. Read Less
Yes and I don’t know why both parties in America largely work against this when our healthcare system is arguably the most broken of any developed country.
Although I said yes, how do we define “basic” healthcare access? A general practitioner? An obstetrician and a free hospital stay after childbirth? Free annual blood tests? A dental check-up? I’ve …Read MoreAlthough I said yes, how do we define “basic” healthcare access? A general practitioner? An obstetrician and a free hospital stay after childbirth? Free annual blood tests? A dental check-up? I’ve listed just a few things I consider basic, but I’m sure others have different ideas of what “basic” means. Read Less
Yes, regardless of political leaning, I think the world would benefit if this was the standard.
Healthcare should be considered a basic human right, and the government has the duty to protect that right.
I think, in general, it’s not necessary for every country to adopt, but I do think it is the case that larger countries with large income disparities would likely see the most improvement with …Read MoreI think, in general, it’s not necessary for every country to adopt, but I do think it is the case that larger countries with large income disparities would likely see the most improvement with universal basic healthcare plans. Read Less
While universal healthcare is a solution to gaps in the ability to obtain healthcare based on financial status, a country must first achieve a certain level of stability that is not viable for every …Read MoreWhile universal healthcare is a solution to gaps in the ability to obtain healthcare based on financial status, a country must first achieve a certain level of stability that is not viable for every country in order to pursue Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Government-provided healthcare suffers in quality and increases wait times for important procedures and is naturally connected to other government priorities, while privatized healthcare incentivizes individual excellence. That is not to say that privatized healthcare is excellent, as it clearly struggles to meet needs as things stand. I do not believe adopting universal basic healthcare is necessary to improve public health outcomes, as other methods, such as improving incentives for hospital systems, can also prove effective. Read Less
Unless human nature and capitalistic tendencies change rapidly then yes its needed
I wouldn’t say that it is “necessary” for countries to adopt universal basic healthcare in order to improve public health outcomes. I think that there are alternative options that can also improve …Read MoreI wouldn’t say that it is “necessary” for countries to adopt universal basic healthcare in order to improve public health outcomes. I think that there are alternative options that can also improve public health like targeted programs and non-universal systems, however, a universal basic healthcare system definitely increases access and reduces health inequalities. It is important to note the concerns about the funding or potential consequences like longer wait times. Read Less
Absolutely, no one should be denying that there is a direct and obvious connection between comprehensive healthcare and improved public health outcomes. UBH allows for a more preventative approach …Read MoreAbsolutely, no one should be denying that there is a direct and obvious connection between comprehensive healthcare and improved public health outcomes. UBH allows for a more preventative approach (checkups, regular appointments for minor issues) rather than a reactionary one or a grave last resort. To avoid the downfalls of UBH, I can see a system where there could be a privatized *option* rather than exclusively public healthcare. But, that could also just lead to a repeat of the system America already has now, where the better service providers just move to the privatized clinics and replicate the class stratification. Not sure how that would play out. Regardless, access to healthcare, especially in “developed” countries, should be a human right. Read Less
I think the crucial part of this question is “to improve public health outcomes”. If you look at the health outcomes of countries with Universal Healthcare and those without, it is quite undeniable …Read MoreI think the crucial part of this question is “to improve public health outcomes”. If you look at the health outcomes of countries with Universal Healthcare and those without, it is quite undeniable that improving health outcomes would require *everyone* have a basic amount of healthcare, no matter how rich or poor they are. Read Less