Without a doubt, people who point out corruption in leadership should be protected for the sake of the people being led. Whistleblowing is a way of protecting the ‘led’ from the ‘leader,’ so the …Read MoreWithout a doubt, people who point out corruption in leadership should be protected for the sake of the people being led. Whistleblowing is a way of protecting the ‘led’ from the ‘leader,’ so the whistleblower needs protection, too.Read Less
Yes, there absolutely should be legal mechanisms to protect whistleblowers, as all government unethical or illegal practices should be exposed to the public. Whistleblowers who expose this stuff …Read MoreYes, there absolutely should be legal mechanisms to protect whistleblowers, as all government unethical or illegal practices should be exposed to the public. Whistleblowers who expose this stuff should absolutely be legally protected.Read Less
Yes, I definitely think that there should be legal mechanisms in place to protect whistleblowers. Whistleblowers provide a check on the government and ensure transparency and accountability. I even …Read MoreYes, I definitely think that there should be legal mechanisms in place to protect whistleblowers. Whistleblowers provide a check on the government and ensure transparency and accountability. I even feel like if they know they will be protected, they are more likely to report misconduct.Read Less
Yes 100 percent. What is the legitimate argument otherwise? Let governments do whatever they want secretly and illegally, and anyone who speaks out is punished?
Yes, there definitely should be legal mechanisms in order to protect whistleblowers who address the governments unethical practices. Whistleblowers play an extremely crucial role in the system in …Read MoreYes, there definitely should be legal mechanisms in order to protect whistleblowers who address the governments unethical practices. Whistleblowers play an extremely crucial role in the system in uncovering corruption, abuse of power, fraud, and many other forms of corruption that might otherwise be hidden. Protecting whistleblowers ensures the public can hold institutions accountable. Secondly, without legal protection whistleblowers often face serious consequences including job loss, harassment, or even legal action. Protection laws are extremely necessary for these individuals because they are doing nothing but good for the people and these laws could help prevent retaliation and encourage others to speak their mind and come forward.Read Less
Yes there should be, a whistleblower is already doing an incredibly dangerous thing, so there should be something to protect them from dangers whenever information surfaces that they exposed.
While there should be legal mechanisms in place, what is considered unethical is often subjective and differs from what is legal. Ethics vary based on perspective; therefore, I believe the government …Read MoreWhile there should be legal mechanisms in place, what is considered unethical is often subjective and differs from what is legal. Ethics vary based on perspective; therefore, I believe the government should have legal mechanisms in place for whistleblowers who expose illegal government practices, but not necessarily unethical ones.Read Less
Absolutely, protection for whistleblowers can decrease government corruption. Even if success rates for individual whistleblowers are not high, having whistleblower protection laws can act as a form …Read MoreAbsolutely, protection for whistleblowers can decrease government corruption. Even if success rates for individual whistleblowers are not high, having whistleblower protection laws can act as a form of deterrence, preventing corrupt practices before they happen.Read Less
Without a doubt, people who point out corruption in leadership should be protected for the sake of the people being led. Whistleblowing is a way of protecting the ‘led’ from the ‘leader,’ so the …Read MoreWithout a doubt, people who point out corruption in leadership should be protected for the sake of the people being led. Whistleblowing is a way of protecting the ‘led’ from the ‘leader,’ so the whistleblower needs protection, too. Read Less
Yes, there absolutely should be legal mechanisms to protect whistleblowers, as all government unethical or illegal practices should be exposed to the public. Whistleblowers who expose this stuff …Read MoreYes, there absolutely should be legal mechanisms to protect whistleblowers, as all government unethical or illegal practices should be exposed to the public. Whistleblowers who expose this stuff should absolutely be legally protected. Read Less
yes, whistleblowers are how we hold those in power accountable and they should be protected from blowback.
Yes, I definitely think that there should be legal mechanisms in place to protect whistleblowers. Whistleblowers provide a check on the government and ensure transparency and accountability. I even …Read MoreYes, I definitely think that there should be legal mechanisms in place to protect whistleblowers. Whistleblowers provide a check on the government and ensure transparency and accountability. I even feel like if they know they will be protected, they are more likely to report misconduct. Read Less
Yes 100 percent. What is the legitimate argument otherwise? Let governments do whatever they want secretly and illegally, and anyone who speaks out is punished?
Yes, there definitely should be legal mechanisms in order to protect whistleblowers who address the governments unethical practices. Whistleblowers play an extremely crucial role in the system in …Read MoreYes, there definitely should be legal mechanisms in order to protect whistleblowers who address the governments unethical practices. Whistleblowers play an extremely crucial role in the system in uncovering corruption, abuse of power, fraud, and many other forms of corruption that might otherwise be hidden. Protecting whistleblowers ensures the public can hold institutions accountable. Secondly, without legal protection whistleblowers often face serious consequences including job loss, harassment, or even legal action. Protection laws are extremely necessary for these individuals because they are doing nothing but good for the people and these laws could help prevent retaliation and encourage others to speak their mind and come forward. Read Less
Yes there should be, a whistleblower is already doing an incredibly dangerous thing, so there should be something to protect them from dangers whenever information surfaces that they exposed.
While there should be legal mechanisms in place, what is considered unethical is often subjective and differs from what is legal. Ethics vary based on perspective; therefore, I believe the government …Read MoreWhile there should be legal mechanisms in place, what is considered unethical is often subjective and differs from what is legal. Ethics vary based on perspective; therefore, I believe the government should have legal mechanisms in place for whistleblowers who expose illegal government practices, but not necessarily unethical ones. Read Less
Absolutely, protection for whistleblowers can decrease government corruption. Even if success rates for individual whistleblowers are not high, having whistleblower protection laws can act as a form …Read MoreAbsolutely, protection for whistleblowers can decrease government corruption. Even if success rates for individual whistleblowers are not high, having whistleblower protection laws can act as a form of deterrence, preventing corrupt practices before they happen. Read Less