Return to Polls

Daily Poll

May 1, 2024

Should there be mandatory psychological evaluations for political leaders?




Total votes: 5

Comments

  1. SensibleHalibut1
    79.5

    yes this is very important, according to me, because political leaders need to have a high level of sensitivity to connect with the public.

    Upvote Upvote
  2. SvgBeast610
    14

    It isn’t necessary and it could become a political weapon to control who enters the office. It would be too difficult to ensure an unbiased evaluation takes place, at least I personally don’t trust …Read MoreIt isn’t necessary and it could become a political weapon to control who enters the office. It would be too difficult to ensure an unbiased evaluation takes place, at least I personally don’t trust that one would happen. Read Less

    Upvote 1
    1 Replies
    1. FearlessHusky1
      132.5

      I was thinking something very similar. It would be useless really, because political parties will question the validity of these evaluations whenever they see fit, and as you said, weaponize this.
      …Read MoreI was thinking something very similar. It would be useless really, because political parties will question the validity of these evaluations whenever they see fit, and as you said, weaponize this tool.
      I do not think it would help, as other comments say, to avoid deranged or insensitive leaders. Because these evaluations can be faked, paid for, altered, etc.
      I think regular drug-tests and mental health check-ups are more useful.
       Read Less

      Upvote Upvote
  3. GraciousElephant5
    104

    Absolutely. That is completely essential. No country should have psychiatrically deranged people running the nation; that’s how we end up with populists.

    Upvote Upvote
    1 Replies
    1. FearlessHusky1
      132.5

      But sociopaths lie and ace these types of evaluations all the time. It would give no guarantees that they are not deranged.

      Upvote Upvote
  4. CuriousPanda2
    114

    This would be a difficult precedent to establish. It would be beneficial to certify the capabilities of political leaders, but it also poses several issues. There would need to be a neutral, third …Read MoreThis would be a difficult precedent to establish. It would be beneficial to certify the capabilities of political leaders, but it also poses several issues. There would need to be a neutral, third-party group of professionals to analyze candidates, which would be hard to find. There is also no way to guarantee that the public accepts any diagnoses for their favored politician(s). I do not think there is an easy and consistent way to administer these evaluations. Read Less

    Upvote Upvote

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copy link