
Hamas leader, during Iran visit, claims Israel failed to achieve military goals in Gaza
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
20% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
N/A
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-10% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : This marks the second visit of the Hamas leader to Tehran, with the first occurring in November, since the conflict between Israel and Hamas began on Oct. 7, which resulted in the deaths of over 32,300 people and injuries to nearly 74,700. Haniyeh's visit came a day after the United Nations Security Council approved its first resolution, calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, after the United States, which had blocked three previous attempts, did not veto the draft.48% : Speaking at a press conference in Tehran, Haniyeh said that despite substantial expenses incurred in the Gaza operation, the Israeli government fell short of its war objectives and instead faced diminishing political and international support.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.