IN-DEPTH: User Data Collected by Overseas Chinese Companies, Such as TikTok, Enables CCP to Influence US Politics
View Original Article-6% Center
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
-2% Center
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
22% Negative
N/A
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Reliability Score Analysis
The Reliability Score of the article is determined on a percentage score basis from 0 to 100%.
- Opposite Sources as Poor for the lower number of sources with different viewpoints.
- Unique Sources as Poor for the lower number of different sources.
- Multiple Sources as Good for a higher number of total sources.
- Multiple Quotes as Excellent for a very high number of quotes used in the article.
- Quote Length as Excellent for a very high number of words used in each quote.
Opposite Sources: 0% Poor (Grade F) Unique Sources: 25% Poor (Grade E) Multiple Sources: 75% Good (Grade B) Multiple Quotes: 100% Excellent (Grade A) Quote Length: 100% Excellent (Grade A)
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Politician Portrayal Analysis:
This article includes the following Politician Portrayal sentiments, providing an average sentiment of 22% Negative and bias score of -10% Liberal:
1 positive sentiment for Jim Banks
1 positive sentiment for Michael Waltz
"On June 20, 2020, as Donald Trump's re-election campaign was in full swing, he fell into a "pitfall" set by TikTok."
This is a negative sentiment.
"Trump tweeted that almost one million people had requested tickets for his rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma."
This is a positive sentiment.
"However, only 6,200 people showed up at the venue that day, which greatly weakened the morale of Trump's campaign team."
This is a negative sentiment.
"In August of 2022, Republican representatives Jim Banks and Michael Waltz wrote a letter to Jeffrey Wichman, the U.S. intelligence community's top official on foreign political interference, saying that, "TikTok, an overseas subsidiary of Chinese company ByteDance, which has members of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on its board, will be policing American political discourse and owning the data of potentially millions of voters."
This is a positive sentiment.
"In August of 2022, Republican representatives Jim Banks and Michael Waltz wrote a letter to Jeffrey Wichman, the U.S. intelligence community's top official on foreign political interference, saying that, "TikTok, an overseas subsidiary of Chinese company ByteDance, which has members of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on its board, will be policing American political discourse and owning the data of potentially millions of voters."
This is a positive sentiment.
Policies:
Protectionist TradePoliticians:
Donald TrumpJim Banks
Michael Waltz
Sentiments
0% In August of 2022, Republican representatives Jim Banks and Michael Waltz wrote a letter to Jeffrey Wichman, the U.S. intelligence community's top official on ..."
0% In August of 2022, Republican representatives Jim Banks and Michael Waltz wrote a letter to Jeffrey Wichman, the U.S. intelligence community's top official on ..."
-2% "These would usually be leftist candidates, but could also be conservative or centrist candidates if they favor free trade with China.""
-6% However, only 6,200 people showed up at the venue that day, which greatly weakened the morale of Trump's campaign team."
-20% On June 20, 2020, as Donald Trump's re-election campaign was in full swing, he fell into a "pitfall" set by TikTok."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : "These would usually be leftist candidates, but could also be conservative or centrist candidates if they favor free trade with China."*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.