Crux Now Article RatingIt's 'wrong' to let Title X cover abortion, says USCCB's pro-life chairman | Crux Now
- Bias Rating
4% Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
78% Extremely Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
60% Negative
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
| "Abortion takes the life of an already-conceived and growing child, he said." | Positive | 6% Conservative |
| "Title X was intended and authorized to be a program entirely separate from abortion, Nauma said, and it plainly states that 'the funds authorized under this legislation (shall) be used only to support preventive family plaing services, population research, infertility services, and other related medical, informational and educational activities.'" | Positive | 6% Conservative |
| "He said the Protect Life Rule draws a bright line between abortion and family plaing." | Positive | 2% Conservative |
Upgrade your account to obtain complete site access and more analytics below. | ||
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : Abortion takes the life of an already-conceived and growing child," he said.53% : "Title X was intended and authorized to be a program entirely separate from abortion," Naumann said, "and it plainly states that 'the funds authorized under this legislation (shall) be used only to support preventive family planning services, population research, infertility services, and other related medical, informational and educational activities.'"
51% : He said the "Protect Life Rule" "draws a bright line between abortion and family planning."
42% : "Abortion is not family planning.
42% : Section 1008 of the law states that "none of the funds appropriated under this title shall be used in programs where abortion is a method of family planning."
41% : It is "wrong to allow taxpayer dollars to fund abortion providers who participate in a pre-pregnancy program specifically designed to exclude abortion," Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City, Kansas, said in an Oct. 7 statement.
36% : He urged Biden "to suspend this proposed rule and leave the Title X program as it was intended and authorized to be -- a program entirely separate from abortion."
32% : The archbishop called it a "terrible policy" that "would reintegrate abortion into what is supposed to be a pre-pregnancy family planning program."
27% : The Biden administration 'is wrong' to allow Title X family planning funds to be used for abortion, said the chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on Pro-Life Activities.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.