The Guardian Article RatingA year after Trump won, why won’t Democrats change their playbook? | Norman Solomon
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
95% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
-66% Medium Left
- Politician Portrayal
-29% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
66% : Tax relief for the large majority in sync with big tax hikes for the wealthy and large corporations.65% : Potential remedies are clear: enhanced Medicare for All.
61% : Free public college.
45% : That largely explains their cold reception to the winner of New York’s Democratic mayoral primary, Zohran Mamdani, whose platform includes higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations along with free city buses, a rent freeze and city-run grocery stores.
43% : Midway through this year, a poll found that a large majority of Democrats wanted elected officials to reduce “corporate influence”, while 86% “said changing the federal tax code so wealthy Americans and large corporations pay more in taxes should be a priority”.skip past newsletter promotionSign up to Fighting BackBig thinkers on what we can do to protect civil liberties and fundamental freedoms in a Trump presidency.
39% : Harris ignored human decency and polling that showed far more voters would be likely to cast their ballots for her if she came out for an arms embargo on Israel.
37% : In February 2019, soon after settling back into the House speaker’s chair, Pelosi insulted supporters of the Green New Deal, referring to it in a media interview as “the green dream or whatever they call it, nobody knows what it is, but they’re for it, right?”As the 2020 presidential election approached, the party establishment was eager to fend off another Sanders campaign.
33% : Also antithetical to the duo’s politics is Mamdani’s unequivocal support for the human rights of Palestinian people being subjected to Israel’s US-backed policies of ethnic cleansing and genocide.By refusing to endorse Mamdani, Schumer has been in tacit league with the billionaires furiously trying to prevent a popular democratic socialist from becoming mayor.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
