ForbesAfrica Needs More Renewables, So Why Is It Investing In Fossil Fuels?
- Bias Rating
6% Center
- Reliability
25% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
6% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
21% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : Large, centrally planned fossil-fuel projects typically benefit from state-guaranteed funding.59% : The financing structure of renewable energy investments varies widely across Sub-Saharan Africa, with projects ranging from fully debt-financed to fully equity-financed models.
46% : Financing is also unevenly distributed, with a few countries receiving the bulk, while the 33 least-developed nations secured only 37% of renewable commitments from 2010 to 2019 Africa is missing out on the green technology revolution that is making non-fossil energy the cheapest option.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
