Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
Washington Post Article Rating

Analysis | Trump team's judicial conspiracy theory suffers a big blow in court

  • Bias Rating

    -10% Center

  • Reliability

    50% ReliableAverage

  • Policy Leaning

    10% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -63% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-27% Negative

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

34% : Trump appointees are increasingly ruling against the administration, too.
30% : The competing theory for why so many judges have blocked Trump is, of course, that he is simply doing lots and lots of things that stretch and even violate the law.
24% : U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr., whom Trump nominated to the bench in 2017, ruled that the administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act to quickly deport Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador was "unlawful."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link