
Analysis | Trump team's judicial conspiracy theory suffers a big blow in court
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
50% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-63% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-27% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
34% : Trump appointees are increasingly ruling against the administration, too.30% : The competing theory for why so many judges have blocked Trump is, of course, that he is simply doing lots and lots of things that stretch and even violate the law.
24% : U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr., whom Trump nominated to the bench in 2017, ruled that the administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act to quickly deport Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador was "unlawful."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.