Understand the bias, discover the truth in your news. Get Started
Firstpost Article Rating

'Anti-semitism a smokescreen, assault targeted': US judge restores $2 bn Harvard grant cut by Trump

  • Bias Rating
  • Reliability

    20% ReliableLimited

  • Policy Leaning

    48% Medium Right

  • Politician Portrayal

    -39% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-11% Negative

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

63% : In the administration's words, it was now federal policy not to support institutions that, in its view, failed to adequately address antisemitism.
54% : The outcome is likely to have lasting repercussions, not just for Harvard but for the broader scenario of higher education.
50% : Supporters of the ruling argue that Judge Burroughs' decision preserves academic freedom and prevents political interference in research and teaching.
49% : At the same time, the ruling leaves unresolved the deeper cultural and political tensions that continue to animate debates on campuses across the country.
47% : He said the independence of higher education was a cornerstone of American democracy, and warned against what he characterised as political interference masquerading as civil rights enforcement.
42% : The ruling, pronounced on Wednesday, is set to reinstate funding for hundreds of research projects that had been abruptly halted when the administration escalated its conflict with Harvard.
41% : Harvard insisted that while it would always enforce anti-discrimination policies, it could not allow federal authorities to dictate curricula, faculty hiring or admissions criteria.
38% : President Trump has indicated that he wants Harvard to contribute at least $500 million as part of a negotiated agreement, although no deal has been finalised.
34% : Some groups were accused of crossing into antisemitic rhetoric, while pro-Palestinian student organisations claimed they were being unfairly targeted for political expression.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link