'Anti-semitism a smokescreen, assault targeted': US judge restores $2 bn Harvard grant cut by Trump
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
20% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
48% Medium Right
- Politician Portrayal
-39% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-11% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : In the administration's words, it was now federal policy not to support institutions that, in its view, failed to adequately address antisemitism.54% : The outcome is likely to have lasting repercussions, not just for Harvard but for the broader scenario of higher education.
50% : Supporters of the ruling argue that Judge Burroughs' decision preserves academic freedom and prevents political interference in research and teaching.
49% : At the same time, the ruling leaves unresolved the deeper cultural and political tensions that continue to animate debates on campuses across the country.
47% : He said the independence of higher education was a cornerstone of American democracy, and warned against what he characterised as political interference masquerading as civil rights enforcement.
42% : The ruling, pronounced on Wednesday, is set to reinstate funding for hundreds of research projects that had been abruptly halted when the administration escalated its conflict with Harvard.
41% : Harvard insisted that while it would always enforce anti-discrimination policies, it could not allow federal authorities to dictate curricula, faculty hiring or admissions criteria.
38% : President Trump has indicated that he wants Harvard to contribute at least $500 million as part of a negotiated agreement, although no deal has been finalised.
34% : Some groups were accused of crossing into antisemitic rhetoric, while pro-Palestinian student organisations claimed they were being unfairly targeted for political expression.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.