Tucson Sentinel Article RatingArizona, other states sue RFK Jr., Trump for 'sabotaging' HHS with DOGE cuts - Click pic for more:
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
55% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
40% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-55% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
8% Positive
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
36% : The cuts also left the World Trade Center Health Program with no doctors to certify new illnesses for coverage, violating requirements under the Zadroga Act that 9/11 survivors receive federal care.35% : Per Kennedy's plan, the department's headcount was to be slashed by roughly 20,000 and its 28 agencies would be consolidated into 15 -- all in the name of reducing federal spending and boosting efficiency.
31% : In March, Kennedy unveiled a dramatic restructuring of the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
