At least Clarence Thomas's odious Dobbs concurrence was honest
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
N/AN/A
- Policy Leaning
84% Very Right
- Politician Portrayal
-62% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
N/A
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : The majority's response to this argument is that abortion is somehow a unique case: "rights regarding contraception and49% : same-sex relationships are inherently different from the right to abortion because the latter (as we have stressed) uniquely involves what Roe and Casey termed 'potential life.'"
46% : But the fact that abortion raises questions about ending lives does not make it any more or less "deeply rooted in our history": it's an act of pure legal handwaving, an invention of a standard designed to escape the obvious consequences of his own logic.
39% : Abortion, he argues, does not pass this test.
35% : Thomas is arguing that such "unenumerated" rights are basically made up: not just the right to abortion protected in Roe, but also protections for birth control in Griswold v. Connecticut, same-sex sexual relations in Lawrence v. Texas, and same-sex marriage in Obergefell.
34% : But if abortion fails, it's hard to see how rights to same-sex marriage and contraception pass.
31% : It's also an argument that the liberal minority -- Justices Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor -- make in their joint dissent: The lone rationale for what the majority does today is that the right to elect an abortion is not "deeply rooted in history": Not until Roe, the majority argues, did people think abortion fell within the Constitution's guarantee of liberty.
25% : In the Supreme Court's opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, Justice Samuel Alito writes that "nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.