
Åžamil Tayyar: There were those who wanted to prevent the Can Holding operation, but they didn't have the power to do so.
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
25% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
12% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-12% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : Based on the findings obtained from the reports of the Financial Crimes Investigation Board (MASAK) and the examination reports prepared by financial audit units, it was initiated that large amounts of unaccounted money were entered through companies operating under Can Holding, and that efforts were made to hide the traces of this money by transferring it between various companies, and that tax obligations were reduced through unbilled transactions and the preparation of fake documents.45% : It was understood that the profit-oriented criminal organization established under the holding structure operated under the leadership of Kemal Can, Mehmet Åžakir Can, and Kenan TekdaÄŸ, making it difficult to monitor and follow up by establishing numerous companies in the same fields of activity, distributing responsibility among organization members by making changes in the boards of directors, and aiming to evade legal sanctions in this way.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.