Both claim to be 2nd Amendment stalwarts, but VP picks Walz and Vance differ on what that means

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

56% : "We either go back with Trump and Vance or we go forward with Harris and Walz.
51% : "I do think that the general consensus is that Trump would be much more favorable from a Second Amendment jurisprudence standpoint in his judicial appointments."
38% : "I do hear a lot from our members that they don't like Trump, but the sole reason they're voting for him is because of the Supreme Court and for federal judicial nominations.
37% : " She said that while she views Trump and Vance as a "gun extremist dream ticket," she said Harris and Walz have given her "hope." "The choice is simple.
37% : " Doar said his organization does not endorse presidential candidates and noted that his members don't necessarily like Trump.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.