
Budget reconciliation: A tale of two chambers - Washington Examiner
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
10% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
22% Somewhat Right
- Politician Portrayal
-54% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
4% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
53% : Most of these limitations are contained within something called the Byrd Rule, which prohibits the inclusion of provisions that: The first three are relatively self-explanatory: don't touch Social Security, stay within committee jurisdictions, and don't enact laws that would increase deficits outside the budget window.52% : Though changing the minimum wage would alter federal spending and revenues, it would do so indirectly as a second-order effect.
47% : However, Trump has publicly supported the House framework, which would include up to $200 billion for border and immigration spending and up to $100 billion for defense spending, along with an adjustable cap of $4 trillion in tax cuts and a $4 trillion debt limit increase.
41% : The Inflation Reduction Act, the Trump tax cuts, or the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and a large portion of Obamacare were all enacted through reconciliation bills.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.