CHRISTOPHER RUFO: Trump vs. Harvard and the whole Ivy League. Why the right is winning the higher ed battle
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-38% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Log In
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative

Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : In a series of letters to Ivy League presidents, it has threatened to withhold billions in federal funding, citing violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other non-discrimination policies.61% : The first field of battle is higher education.
51% : Consider the historical precedent: if pressed, I'm sure Eisgruber would concede that President Eisenhower was right to mandate desegregation in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1957 -- and to deploy the 101st Airborne Division to enforce it.
47% : In fact, they are among the most active practitioners of racial discrimination, stereotyping, and segregation in America today.
47% : In fact, they are among the most active practitioners of racial discrimination, stereotyping, and segregation in America today.
38% : Eisgruber argues that federal intervention is illegitimate, but he has no ground to stand on.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.