National Review Article RatingCongress Should Pass the DOGE Cuts | National Review
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-2% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
13% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
55% : In a welcome sign of initiative and agency from the legislative branch, some Senate Republicans want spending cuts from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to be part of a rescission package to be approved by Congress.44% : That will still require entitlement reform and spending cuts enacted through the appropriations process.
30% : The rescission power fell into disuse under Bill Clinton.
24% : Trump tried to use it during his first term but failed because of a lack of coordination with Congress.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
