COP30: Belém summit ends with deal that omits 'fossil fuels,' disappointing activists
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
-20% Somewhat Left
- Politician Portrayal
-53% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-5% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
63% : Stiell noted that investments in renewable energy now outpace fossil fuels two to one, calling it "a political and market signal that cannot be ignored."53% : Yet, even without a Trump administration presence, observers were disappointed in the power of fossil fuel-producing countries to derail ambition.
41% : Lago announced plans to draft two new roadmaps in response to the concerns: one to halt and reverse deforestation, and another to guide a "just, orderly and equitable" transition away from fossil fuels while mobilising resources to support those efforts.
28% : The United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, ended Saturday in Belém, Brazil, with a sweeping agreement that avoids any mention of "fossil fuels," drawing sharp criticism from environmental and human rights groups who said the deal falls short of what is needed to confront the climate crisis.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
