Washington Examiner Article RatingDaily on Energy: California wildfire doubles, UN secretary general versus extreme heat, and oral arguments on Vineyard Wind - Washington Examiner
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-4% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-21% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : The official outlined a plan to combat heat, with four areas of focus: caring for vulnerable populations, upping protections for workers, boosting the infrastructure of economies to adapt to the heat, and phasing out fossil fuels.52% : "The disease is the addiction to fossil fuels.
45% : The United Nations' Secretary General is launching a global call to action to combat heat - and went as far as to blame fossil fuels for the record-breaking temperatures many countries are experiencing.
42% : In his call to divest from fossil fuels, Guterres called for ending new coal projects and shifting fossil fuel subsidies to renewables while supporting vulnerable countries.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
