This Is Anfield Article RatingDayot Upamecano 'among candidates' for Liverpool centre-back transfer
- Bias Rating
- Reliability
25% ReliableLimited
- Policy Leaning
-6% Center
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates.
Bias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
23% Positive
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
52% : That has prompted claims of interest in Bayern and France defender Upamecano, whose own contract is also due to run out on July 1. BILD's Tobias Altschaffl and Sky Germany's Florian Plettenberg have both named Liverpool as an interested party as Bayern struggle to tie down their No. 2. Upamecano has been touted as a target for the Reds since he was a teenager at RB Leipzig, with strong links up until his €42.5 million move to Munich in 2021.51% : In many ways he is similar to his countryman Konate, and given the possible need to replace their No. 5 that may explain Liverpool's renewed links with Upamecano.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.
