Did a unanimous SCOTUS deliver a victory for religious expression today?

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

59% : Christianity Today called the unanimous ruling in Groff v USPS a "victory for religious liberty," quoting Gerald Groff's attorneys at First Liberty:
58% : The real stakes for religious liberty are in 303 Creative.
44% : The Supreme Court's decision in Groff also doesn't relate to "religious liberty," at least not directly.
44% : That's a lot better than a punt for the plaintiff, but it's not an outright W for him or for religious liberty.
41% : The decision in question did not come from today's 6-3 ruling in SFFA v Harvard that overturned affirmative action.
39% : That decision will come tomorrow, and NBC News speculated yesterday that Neil Gorsuch may write the controlling opinion: Neil Gorsuch may be the author of 303 Creative v. Elenis, the case about a Christian woman who doesn't want to make wedding websites for same-sex couples (though no one asked her to do so).
35% : In fact, one has to wonder whether Gorsuch -- the most small-L libertarian of the justices -- might not want to address the broader speech implications of public-access law and regulation, which could be just as much of a bombshell as SFFA v Harvard will prove to be.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.