Editorial: 'Unfit,' 'erratic,' 'crazy.' Voters should listen to former Trump insiders.

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

73% : They and other insiders say Trump won't have their votes in November, a remarkable rebellion by any standard.
60% : But don't listen to us -- listen to those who worked closest to Trump the last time he was in power.
57% : That in itself should be a full stop, but there's so much more: his call to suspend the Constitution so he could return to power; his authoritarian openness to using the military against American protesters; his plan to deliberately politicize the ranks of federal civil service; the real and truly horrifying possibility that he would destroy NATO while bolstering foreign dictators.
46% : But they also highlight a dynamic that's worth attention: Trump is publicly reviled by more of his former top administration officials and political allies than any president in modern times and probably ever.
40% : "The American people should listen to what these folks are saying because it should be alarming that the people that Trump hired to work for him a first term are saying that he's unfit to serve for a second term.
21% : The most damning argument remains the fact that Trump attempted to overthrow an election and has all but promised to do it again should he lose in November.
16% : " "Trump is unfit to be president," wrote Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton.
14% : "I believe anyone that puts themselves over the Constitution should never be president of the United States," said Trump's vice president, Mike Pence, whose life was literally threatened by rope-wielding Trump loyalists on Jan. 6. "There's no way I'll vote for Trump," said Trump Defense Secretary Mark Esper, who called him "a threat to democracy.
9% : " "Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people -- does not even pretend to try," wrote Trump Defense Secretary James Mattis.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.